![]() |
New England Wolfpack Punishment - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: Suspensions/Punishments (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=226) +---- Thread: New England Wolfpack Punishment (/showthread.php?tid=106738) |
RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - RomanesEuntDomus - 05-19-2020 Okay wow, can't wait for that appeals process. Should be a doozy. RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - Loco - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 06:19 PMCampinKiller Wrote: Will make my own drinking game. @Loco take notes.leave me alone im already drinking oh also, ace is a good guy. i think this was the correct decision and anyone who disagrees is a moron. "hey this is ace go bruins". LIFE. ![]() RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - CampinKiller - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 08:18 PMLoco Wrote:05-19-2020, 06:19 PMCampinKiller Wrote: Will make my own drinking game. @Loco take notes.leave me alone im already drinking I require evidence RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - JHS - 05-19-2020 This is obviously the doing of BadWolf fire her already RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - Loco - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 08:19 PMCampinKiller Wrote:05-19-2020, 08:18 PMLoco Wrote: leave me alone im already drinking also see above, finish your drink RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - boom - 05-19-2020 The part that’s concerning for me is the second trade, between NEW and CHI. The Syndicate traded back eight spots with the understanding that they would be receiving a S55 3rd round pick. They could not possibly have received this pick at all, as it had been traded to two different teams already. Yet there was no change in compensation required, and the trade was simply processed without a second thought. Will Chicago be getting any other compensation out of this? Just curious as an outside observer. RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - hotdog - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 08:25 PMthecanadiancanuck Wrote: The part that’s concerning for me is the second trade, between NEW and CHI. The Syndicate traded back eight spots with the understanding that they would be receiving a S55 3rd round pick. They could not possibly have received this pick at all, as it had been traded to two different teams already. Yet there was no change in compensation required, and the trade was simply processed without a second thought. Will Chicago be getting any other compensation out of this? Just curious as an outside observer. The trade with Chicago has been re-negotiated and accepted RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - SlashACM - 05-19-2020 Personally I think we should revisit the NOLA punishment a third time RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - JHS - 05-19-2020 All jokes aside though if the first time was the pick tracker’s fault then how can you punish him twice someone please explain to me how the failure of the league to update a service they offer GM’s to avoid this very thing warrants the GM being punished for what is essentially the league’s fault. RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - boom - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 08:26 PMhotdog Wrote:Fair enough05-19-2020, 08:25 PMthecanadiancanuck Wrote: The part that’s concerning for me is the second trade, between NEW and CHI. The Syndicate traded back eight spots with the understanding that they would be receiving a S55 3rd round pick. They could not possibly have received this pick at all, as it had been traded to two different teams already. Yet there was no change in compensation required, and the trade was simply processed without a second thought. Will Chicago be getting any other compensation out of this? Just curious as an outside observer. RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - Keygan - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 08:27 PMJHS Wrote: All jokes aside though if the first time was the pick tracker’s fault then how can you punish him twice Never in any punishment ever has pick tracker not being updated been an excuse for double trading a pick. RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - JHS - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 08:38 PMKeygan Wrote:05-19-2020, 08:27 PMJHS Wrote: All jokes aside though if the first time was the pick tracker’s fault then how can you punish him twice From my POV thats a fault with the rule and the precedent of punishment, and it still seems like if you put in a measure to prevent it, the measure not being properly kept is still at fault. RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - Samsung virtual assistant - 05-19-2020 Is draft pick tracker a paid position? RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - Wallflower - 05-19-2020 05-19-2020, 08:27 PMSlashACM Wrote: Personally I think we should revisit the NOLA punishment a third timeI have made a unilateral decision that no NOLA players can be on thread teams as additional punishment. Case closed RE: New England Wolfpack Punishment - JHS - 05-19-2020 accidental dbl |