Simulation Hockey League
Are things starting to look up in regards to parity? - Printable Version

+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: SHL Discussion (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+--- Thread: Are things starting to look up in regards to parity? (/showthread.php?tid=120856)

Pages: 1 2


RE: Are things starting to look up in regards to parity? - fishy - 12-29-2021

12-29-2021, 09:12 AMRonniewalker Wrote:
12-27-2021, 09:23 PMfishy Wrote: Tbf the shn did this and teams were still ass
Yea btw, did you ever finish that series?

no, I got busy and no one else ever finished posting lol


RE: Are things starting to look up in regards to parity? - DrunkenTeddy - 12-30-2021

I think the sample size is a bit too small if you're only looking at this playoffs. Including the last one it seems like there is more work to be done, but that being said, some of the contract changes have started to hit the big teams and new regression goes in this off-season, which in theory should shorten competitive windows.


RE: Are things starting to look up in regards to parity? - FlappyGiraffe - 12-31-2021

I still think a big issue here is that the RFA period is shorter than the time it takes to be a useable player at the SHL level (for the most part). In the NHL teams hold RFA rights for a good chunk of their prime, while in the SHL teams generally lose rights immediately after their rookie year or so.