![]() |
HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: Suspensions/Punishments (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=226) +---- Thread: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings (/showthread.php?tid=118564) |
RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - .simo - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:44 AMspooked Wrote: [quote pid='3091123' dateline='1629520721'] [/quote] This is exactly why discord screenshots should never be allowed. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - DeadlyPlayer - 08-21-2021 Imagine owners pressuring HO to make a decision that's so out there that I need to suck my own tits. Crazy. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Pythonic - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 05:53 AMDeadlyPlayer Wrote: Imagine owners pressuring HO to make a decision that's so out there that I need to suck my own tits. Crazy.video? RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - .simo - 08-21-2021 Send that my way too please Deadly. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - DeadlyPlayer - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 06:01 AMPythonic Wrote:okay, feel free to subscribe to my free onlyfans.....................wait................08-21-2021, 05:53 AMDeadlyPlayer Wrote: Imagine owners pressuring HO to make a decision that's so out there that I need to suck my own tits. Crazy.video? RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Mayuu - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 05:50 AMsimo_393 Wrote:This is exactly why discord screenshots should never be allowed.08-21-2021, 12:44 AMspooked Wrote: [quote pid='3091123' dateline='1629520721'] [/quote] So you can't tamper on discord either I guess. Since it can't be proven/disproven RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Snussu - 08-21-2021 Slap to the wrists basically RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Raven - 08-21-2021 Literally 1984 RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - OrbitingDeath - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 05:38 AMWashed-up trash Wrote: Are trades submitted an hour after the trade deadline legal too if they were agreed upon in DMs? I am backclaiming the Ron Mexico trophy I was nominated for as well, as all my votes came in DM's. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Mutedfaith - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 07:46 AMOrbitingDeath Wrote:I was promised this seasons 4 star cup in DMs.08-21-2021, 05:38 AMWashed-up trash Wrote: Are trades submitted an hour after the trade deadline legal too if they were agreed upon in DMs? RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - zaynzk - 08-21-2021 It’s been over 12 hours and this still is an embarrassment RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - spooked - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 05:50 AMsimo_393 Wrote: This is exactly why discord screenshots should never be allowed. GMs use screenshots every season. They wouldn't want the site being the only method, especially if they lose players because of it. It is a game of trust. We trust GMs to some degree to not make stuff up, that's why we pick them. It's one thing to make a mistake or us to not see a mistake, it's another to doctor or lie about what happened. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - SFresh3 - 08-21-2021 08-20-2021, 11:38 PMPythonic Wrote: oh also, thread team Hell yeah, I finally made it in the SHL. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Segi - 08-21-2021 The main reason this feels weird to me, is that technically HAM didn't break any rule. You don't have to sign your rookies and the rulebook is pretty clear about what happens if you don't. (Other teams can bid on them.) Now if we're accepting verified contract agreements on discord as official signings, HAM gets punished here for doing absolutely nothing wrong. But if we don't accept that and say that the contracts have to be posted by a certain deadline, the owners just, within a couple of hours, created a new solution to a situation that wasn't explicitly mentioned but still covered in the rule book before it arose. Now I can somewhat see the argument of not wanting to force the players off the team, but let's be honest, they would've made way more money for the next season at least and absolutely still had the opportunity to return to HAM until the time they graduate from the SMJHL. So I don't really feel the players un question would've been off all that badly. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Gwdjohnson - 08-21-2021 Pretty fair decision all things considered except maybe could've been a first instead of a way back future 2nd or 1.5mil cap fine instead of 1 (500k per prospect). Don't really see why they needed a nuclear punishment when they had prior agreements with the players being bid on, like was said earlier, that doesn't follow what the bidding rule was meant for at all. |