STL - VAN - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: League Transactions (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Forum: General Transactions (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=332) +---- Forum: SMJHL Roster Transactions (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=330) +----- Forum: Processed Transactions (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=629) +----- Thread: STL - VAN (/showthread.php?tid=36564) Pages:
1
2
|
- JumpierPegasus - 07-05-2014 To 5th Overall 20th Overall To 3rd Overall Done deal, it was quick and easy before I leave for the weekend - Wongy - 07-05-2014 Easy negotiations, thanks jp - 701 aka YUNG GUAP GOD - 07-05-2014 Good trade for both teams. - Seth - 07-05-2014 Surprised by this move for Vancouver. One can make the argument the 20th selection will garner a player near the equivalency of the 5th selection in this draft. Clearly Vancouver has identified a specific player they desire. All that remains to be seen if the 20th selection will be worth the difference. - 701 aka YUNG GUAP GOD - 07-05-2014 Quote:Originally posted by Seth@Jul 5 2014, 11:31 AMSometimes you need to risk the possible thing for the sure thing. - Seth - 07-05-2014 Quote:Originally posted by 701@Jul 5 2014, 01:34 PMOf course, I am simply questioning the value of securing the sure thing. The trade makes logical sense for both teams, but based on pure value; I thoroughly believe St. Louis wins the trade currently. - 701 aka YUNG GUAP GOD - 07-05-2014 Quote:Originally posted by Seth@Jul 5 2014, 11:36 AMI think STL did win trade value wise, of course. But in the end, I like it a lot for both teams. - Seth - 07-05-2014 Quote:Originally posted by 701@Jul 5 2014, 01:38 PMI concur, by no means am I chastising Vancouver; they clearly have identified a specific member, they believe will trump the value of both selections they surrendered. I personally value depth over star-power, so I presuppose it stems from a differentiation in draft philosophy. - 701 aka YUNG GUAP GOD - 07-05-2014 Quote:Originally posted by Seth@Jul 5 2014, 11:39 AMWell you also have to factor in the pieces returning to Vancouver. They have plenty of great players already on the team as send downs, now they are adding big key pieces to win them back to back cups. I'm just doing this for the sake of debating now :lol: - HabsFanFromOntario - 07-05-2014 In this draft 20th could become better than 5th. So much boom or bust potential here. - artermis - 07-05-2014 Quote:Originally posted by JumpierPegasus+Jul 5 2014, 12:23 PM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1' id='QUOTE-WRAP'><tr><td>QUOTE (JumpierPegasus @ Jul 5 2014, 12:23 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->To <!--QuoteBegin-Seth@Jul 5 2014, 01:31 PM Surprised by this move for Vancouver. One can make the argument the 20th selection will garner a player near the equivalency of the 5th selection in this draft. Clearly Vancouver has identified a specific player they desire. All that remains to be seen if the 20th selection will be worth the difference.[/quote] I wasn't surprised, but acknowledged the same thought process. - Nike - 07-05-2014 Love this trade :ph34r: - cfekete - 07-05-2014 VAN must feel they wont get their guy at #5 so they move up to #3 for a much better opportunity. It is a very deep draft however so it'll be interesting how this deal works out when the top 20 selections are complete. - Mac - 07-05-2014 The top 12 selections look damn good, hard to tell where it really starts to drop off. - Andy - 07-05-2014 This makes things very interesting as it seems both teams already have players in mind. I'd love to see each teams draft boards post draft |