Simulation Hockey League
Toedragon84 6/30 - Printable Version

+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: League Media (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=610)
+--- Forum: Graphics (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=52)
+---- Forum: Weekly Submissions (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=274)
+----- Forum: Graded Weekly Submissions (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=567)
+----- Thread: Toedragon84 6/30 (/showthread.php?tid=97462)



Toedragon84 6/30 - ToeDragon84 - 06-30-2019

[Image: z7zmZ4J.png]
@Massive Coiler
[Image: GdZCLBn.png]
@"ThatDamnMcJesus"

[Image: FqV3KbL.png]
@fever95
[Image: djgBUwH.png]
@JSS


RE: Toedragon84 6/30 - JSS - 06-30-2019

Ahh

thanks toeman


RE: Toedragon84 6/30 - crutch - 06-30-2019

Very nice toe


RE: Toedragon84 6/30 - Smirnov Light - 07-28-2019

Sigs
1) I like the idea behind the sig however the render has minimal integration to the sig apart from the color and depth flow behind him which can be seen as a compliment. The text needs work although the idea behind it is something that I could get behind. The placement of the render is very good and when thinking about sigs in a rule of 9 parts the sig does well in that regard -- just needs more work and integration to reach its potential.
2/5

2) This sig is a clear step up from the previous one, the render is well placed a focal point and is integrated into the sig. The text is more effective than the previous one and does not take away ones focus from the sig. A more obvious lighting source would be an upgrade to truly captivate a spectators eye however the ability to truly make the sig bring someones attention to the middle makes up for it.
4/5

3) I am not as much of a fan of this one compared to the others. and the sig itself keeps a very similar style to the other ones. Again any form of lighting source would add to the sig but the stock work and depth is really what brings this to a 3
3/5

4) I really like this one however his face seems pretty washed which is distracting. I like the color schemes and the lighting towards the bottom of the text. I'd say the circle in between the two texts is slightly distracting in a semi-bad/semi-good way as it focuses my eyes in the area rather than just the render itself.
3/5

Total: 3M


RE: Toedragon84 6/30 - Lazyeye - 08-04-2019

Arbitration: First sig being moved to a 3/5. Similar comments that smirnov light gave throughout his grading but the sig itself is deserving of a score between 2.5 and a 3, which I decided to more favored a 3.

Total Money Awarded: 250k