Create Account

Minnesota Chiefs/Leafs4ever Punishment
#16

So we really didn't have any goalies this season... :ph34r:
Reply
#17

Quote:Originally posted by Bojo@Dec 7 2015, 10:01 AM
Everybody said no to leaf's punishment but he insisted.
I feel like you shouldn't be able to decide on your own punishment, even if you are Commish. Obviously he's being harsher on himself, but if this were flipped and he was being too lenient shouldn't it be up to the rest of the HO to override that decision?

[Image: pb_olli.gif]

Profile | Updates

[Image: vtXGfpR.png]

Profile

[Image: N2ANQtw.png]

Profile
Reply
#18

Quote:Originally posted by prettyburn@Dec 7 2015, 03:08 PM
I feel like you shouldn't be able to decide on your own punishment, even if you are Commish. Obviously he's being harsher on himself, but if this were flipped and he was being too lenient shouldn't it be up to the rest of the HO to override that decision?

This, plus the fact it's a very harsh precedent that has to be followed now for such a minor mistake.
Reply
#19

Imma go full nerd here and say leafs rolled a 1 on his ban hammer check Smile)

[Image: livius.gif]
Reply
#20

Quote:Originally posted by prettyburn@Dec 7 2015, 10:08 AM

I feel like you shouldn't be able to decide on your own punishment, even if you are Commish. Obviously he's being harsher on himself, but if this were flipped and he was being too lenient shouldn't it be up to the rest of the HO to override that decision?
Especially considering that he did go way too easy on himself here.
Reply
#21

Martins Pedersons strikes again.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)




Navigation

 

Extra Menu

 

About us

The Simulation Hockey League is a free online forums based sim league where you create your own fantasy hockey player. Join today and create your player, become a GM, get drafted, sign contracts, make trades and compete against hundreds of players from around the world.