10-28-2018, 10:27 PMkit Wrote:

10-28-2018, 10:24 PMEggy216 Wrote: I beg to differ on calling this a “suspending tirade.” We’re referring to two situations 3 months (roughly, making an estimate knowing it’s offseason-offseason) apart. I would actually say that’s lower than we saw back in the day, even if the specific numbers in each situation have been a little higher than leafs and I believe they should be.

Truly, the punishments given to those three are what the rulebook says can be given for baiting (as an aside, I take issue with the description of the situation as “abuse of the reputation function”, but I guess that’s what happens when one person writes the actual post and nobody proofreads it), so I don’t think they necessarily erred in their action. I actually took the conversation back to them right before announcing it, and everyone agreed with the assessment Leafs and I made on the appeal so they understand our thought process as well.

So to get back to your original question, yes I’ve spoken to the team about what happened here.

So if they all agreed then why was the suspension even the way it was in the first place??

LW - Rainbow Dash - Updates
[img=0x0]https://i.imgur.com/eM6YKiW.gif[/img]
Rainbow Dash Fan S24-Present
SHL Commissioner S34-S52
New England Wolfpack GM S30-S40
Montreal Milita Co-GM S26-S29