You'd have to rank the players by where they rank in each of the attributes you posted for this post to have any purpose or point whatsoever. As it stands you pretty much made the case that nominees were selected well since they're top 10 in everything. I'd be more curious to see you average every players placement which is pretty simple to do in a spreadsheet use a weighted average. Scoop probably gets like a 5 overall across the board idk. So the question becomes is anyone better but also some attributes are more important than others . Hits don't have any value, shots blocked have minor value, then win shares and steals and takeaways vs giveaway ratio are obviously the big ones.


Also I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how nominations work, obviously you see the field is quite divided right no clear winner. Well in order to be nominated you had to be nominated by 60% of the committee who voted privately not knowing who others were voting for. None of my nominees even made the list for example. So it's just an award that will have 10 different arguments for different players and definitely the toughest with no concensus winner