06-28-2019, 06:04 AMBaelor Swift Wrote: Wait wait wait... I originally read this differently... So to put this into clearer terms...

ThatDamnMcJesus: Thought he did regression correctly but never submitted it
Confusion: Thought he did regression correctly but couldn't complete it correctly.

Both members did the same thing wrong: they did not complete their regression by the deadline.

Why does it now matter how the offense came about? In so many past punishments, the reason for the breaking of a rule, especially related to in-sim offenses, never mattered. It would be great to hear from HO why such different punishments were decided for what seem to be the exact same offense.

2 people killed someone accidently and get charged with manslaughter.

Person 1
How they killed the person: Drunk driving accident
Why it happened: Self medication through alcohol for depression

Person 2
How they killed the person: Shoves friend during a tussle, friend trips backward and hits head on cement ground
Why it happened: Friends got physical during a disagreement

The same crime technically, nobody really cares about why it happened right now (though maybe that says more about how America treats mental health issues that anything), but we probably all look at the drunk driver and think he's a piece of shit who killed someone through their stupidity while the 2nd case is the victim unfortunate circumstances.