10-21-2019, 04:43 PMbbjygm Wrote:

10-21-2019, 04:07 PMMike Izzy Wrote: wait..when you say 'anything earned after xx is not subject to regression' ....that can be read as allowing you to add tpe past the regression number and TPE cut off date?

AFAIK, people have been applying TPE to their update, then regressing the amount of TPE specified by the regression post. When I first started updating I pointed out that this would allow people to occasionally avoid going below the thresholds that cap players' stats due to regression, but it had been standard procedure before and there was no rule against, so we just kept chugging along in the name of fairness.

Hi @bbjygm

when you say standard proceedure, whos doing it this way? can we post in here some update examples of what led to the change? cause the information itself is pretty straight forward..and i worry that i and allot of other regressors lost out on there builds in a big way over what is very straight forward wording on what to do and why...


Eggy gives each person a number to regress at as i had below with 1845:




then theres a cut off date on the additional TPE claims we can use as part of the regression number, as seen below:





--
So anything before 9/9 has to be claimed and anything after should not. pretty straight forward and understandable as eggys deadline date makes these 2 regression rules below work.

-Once they drop to 85, all non-strength stats cannot be boosted beyond 85'
-Once they drop to 82, all non-strength stats cannot be boosted beyond 82.'



So if you use your 70-95 offseason tpe that are past the deadline to pad your attributes you are assuring youll never have to make a difficult player build decision, which is a clear circumvention of the rules. what part of the above wording is a loophole?