What worries you about switching to FHM?
|
![]() Trading Card Admins S45 Challenge Cup Champion 11-27-2019, 02:27 PMChris-McZehrl Wrote: I brought it up over my time here ... yeah you lowered the TPE but maybe we need with the actually scale only a max of 1000 possible used TPE? maybe then this shitty problem would be solved? you want player types? then make the build templates harsher! You can also then reduce the regression and not so many would feel regressed to harsh! McZ we aren't saying you can't make a playmaker in STHS, we're saying that empirically the best build is 99 SC, 99 PH, 99 DF, 90 EN and everything else at 40. The test sims have concluded that. As Tomen and DrunkenTeddy have said we're working on making STHS and FHM both viable options but it looks like STHS is not a long term possibility due to the brokenness of scoring and passing as it pertains to the decision making algorithm. We're going to likely be changing the update scale either way, but there's no reason to change anything regarding media, PTs, contracts, etc. @Tomen do you have any screenshots to show how busted this is? I can't find it but I saw one where someone took Chicago and only set SC to 99 and PA to 40 and they shredded the league. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |