Those are the criteria YOU chose, so let's do the head-to-head match-ups based on those:
Scholz vs. Doskocil 5-2
Kennedy vs. Doskocil 4-3
Selich vs. Doskocil 4-3
Emerson vs. Doskocil 4-3
Loses every single match-up even using your cherry-picked stats. Not a snub. Next.
Look I like you guys in Manhattan, I really do, but stuff like this is why I can barely take you seriously in the context of Awards disussions anymore. Every season you complain about someone from your team being snubbed and every time it's not backed up by the stats. At least Emerson had a legitimate case to make.
yeah sure 5-2, but i wouldnt call a 2.0 > 2.1 that much. Doskocil doubled him in SB, Scholz has about 3 less shots on ice against his goalie ever 60 minutes he was on ice. But Scholz also had more takeways, almost double
I see Doskocil edging him out on Hits, SB. With GA, SA being pretty close. a .1 difference in GA/60 and 1 less Shot per 60 minutes. And about the same CF%.
I see these numbers and they look pretty close to eachother, other than Kennedy having 11 more Takeaways than him.
Okay so what about the winner of the award. I see Selich having far better SA numbers than Doskocil, absolutely. Doskocil had more hits, I see them the same in the GvA and TkA department. Doskocil had more Shots blocked, basicallly the same GA/60, and then killed him in GA/60
With emerson you said it yourself its weird because hits and SB are inflated.
Emerson - 132 hits - 19 gva - 48 tka - 235 SB - 3.4 GA/60 - 34 SA/60 - 40.4 CF%
Doskocil 86 hits - 20 gva - 19 Tka - 117 SB - 2.1 GA/60 - 24.5 SA/60 - 60.5 CF%
So Emerson had inflated stats due to being on a shitty team, where Doskocil had better adv stats because of it
I never said Doskocil deserves to win it. I just said that he is underappreciated for the awards committee.