Let's talk about parity... again
|
SpartanGibbles
SMJHL GM Finally a real SHL GM 01-31-2021, 11:38 PMDrunkenTeddy Wrote: I believe parity is an issue, but it's not because we keep seeing the same teams making the finals, sure that's part of it, but I think the lack of parity has a huge impact on individual players. In sths you could be a 1000 tpe guy on a rebuilding team and pick up 40+ points, in fhm those same players are lucky to break 25. We did not realize when we moved to fhm that it would be so drastic. When a player on a rebuilding team can't even feel like they are performing decently they aren't likely to want to stay for a rebuild to finish. Add to that the fact that sub 800 tpe players are a detriment to their team on the ice and we have an issue that increases the length of time a rebuild takes and hurts the players involved when it comes to stats.As someone in charge of and on a rebuilding team through the entire FHM swap, I think you hit the nail on the head Teddy. Before with Simon even if your team was bad you could have an all star caliber season with a high tpe player. You just don't see this in FHM. I went from 50 points in my last STHS season(roughly 1500+TPE at the time) to 28-30 each season after until our team started getting more pieces up. I won't lie that I hate that my players peak seasons were likely tanked by the timing of the switch but in general the FHM change has been a massive positive for the league that outweighs my personal gripes. It's hard to tell a team we are getting better when players can't see more individual success like before until a team improves overall. While I haven't been able to contribute as much to the new update scale discussions, I love that HO and the Owners are taking steps to make things better for the league. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |