What’s interesting is the thought that every team who’s window closes or gets old HAS to embark on a long rebuild. That would negate the special accomplishment of the Calgary Dragon's over the past 3 seasons. In S58 we were the oldest team in the league by far. We had a total of 4 players not in regression! That means 13 players were on there way out!.. since that time 75% of the team has changed!.. now we have just 4 players in regression... and we did it while winning the division 3 times! And while getting to a western conference championship series!… I’m not sure there’s a single team in recent history that rebuilt a whole roster this successfully… because it’s so obscure to see a team turnover this easily, we will see if history understands/recognizes what the dragons accomplished.



Hard question which the site elders have wrestled with for almost 10 seasons now.. the truth is unless we change to a different or upgraded engine, were stuck picking apart of the essence of what is the SHL to try and fix the issues that plague the sim… I understand why we have added the changes we have but I’m unsure if there good changes.. we have run a very successful league up until now and when we start picking apart the pieces that made it successful we tinkering with things we don’t know. But will see. My hope is The new version of FHM will incorporate more ‘chance’ to the overall outcome .. they need to find a way to allow the accasional tesm need in the top tier tpe group to win. If they do that then perhaps we can change some of the changes we recently made on the regression and contract side of things.



We’ll, I don’t think there’s an importance tier when it comes to winning a championship. To win a title comes great work from everyone.. from management to the players…and it doesn’t matter which engine we are using to get there. Sths and FHM are very different gameplays.. both have there good and bads.



Mike Izzy = 16 TPE