02-09-2022, 03:32 AMMazatt Wrote:

02-09-2022, 03:11 AMKatth Wrote: Most people that are defending him know exactly what he did and (while it doesn't make it right) why he did it. Unlike the woke pitchfork crew attacking him without knowing what he has actually done.

This part doesn't really make sense to me. What he did isn't right, and so people are upset, but that's actually the woke pitchfork crew coming out despite him doing something wrong, and that then being defended? The logic just doesn't add up that people will defend him for anything being the point of refutation, but the way it's being refuted is that he should be defended despite doing something wrong? I just can't see where those two ideas intersect.

People are coming in here to defend Izzy, because this thread is supposed to be about nour's punishment, and the immediate reaction of some was to blame Izzy for what nour sent him.

What Izzy said was wrong.
What nour said was wrong.

This isn't that hard.