04-28-2023, 09:56 PMluke Wrote: Question here: if the committee agrees that it is tampering, why is the trade still be letting go? Onto that fact, what power shows the appeals committee is allowed to overturn a rejection of a trade due to tampering?

Wouldn’t this lead to future tampering charges that have a trade before the punishment still lead to the trade being let go through which directly contradicts the whole tampering case?

Piggybacking off this - tampering has such tough punishments specifically because it's so hard to undo. Once the player wants to go to the tampering team it's not good for the tampered team to force that user to stay.

What if we did something like, instead of forfeiting draft picks flat out, the offending team forfeits their picks to the tampered team in addition to whatever was agreed upon in the trade as direct compensation?