Prompt 2

In an ideal world it would seem like any sort of unhanded play wouldn't be part of the sport and think that for the purity of sportsmanship, it would simply a demonstration of skill and skill alone.

Yet as many would argue, being able to get away with some of the dark arts is a matter of skill in itself that is still within the game.

If having great physical positioning that can prevent the opposition at doing what they want to do, then how is it that the arbitrarily drawn lawn is what is considered wrong.


Even as part of a commonly agreed norm, it should rather be seen that it isn't commonly agreed at all considering the numbers of different referees making different calls even with an imposed emphasis from head office to make a specific kind of call. These lines which become murkier and murkier lead straight to the slope of allowing deception as a form of skill.

If that was theoretically allowed, I think the rise of physicality would then come ahead.