Quote:1. CW TRIVIA, 3 TPE max - 1.5 TPE for participation, 0.5 TPE for each correct answer. This is completed through a Google form linked below. Make sure to spell your answers correctly or you will not get credit. Post your verification word in your CW post.

pumpkin

Quote:Written, 50 to 200+ words each. Short Prompts
6. How was the season for you player? What you expect from next one?

For Jae-ik Barron, the season was a good one stats wise. He had 82 points, 27 of those being goals. In this way he was an important part of the Atlanta Inferno’s offense. Barron also had an average of just under a minute played on the penalty kill per game, which while not as much as some of his teammates, would still qualify as contributing in my opinion.

I think next season will see much of the same. What I’m hoping for specifically is for surpassing the 30 goal mark, as well as having more success in the playoffs with Atlanta. Personal statistical growth is nice but the goal is to win the Challenge Cup in the end.

Quote:11. Written, 50 to 200+ words. Give Me More
When things stay the same for too long there is risk of them becoming stale, so to ensure that doesn’t happen we need to add something or to something and as you were just elected as dictator of SHL you get to make the pick. Are we going to have more games? Maybe add few teams or 4th lines to current ones? Could even add more stats to spend our TPE by not standardazing the mental stats? What or to what would you add and why?

I really wish that specifically the mental stats were unlocked for players. It would add another dimension to building a player. I realize, though, that there’s always a danger of ‘ideal’ stats that everyone feels compelled to follow because they are so good as to be almost required. This is what happened with shooting in STHS, so maybe risking that isn’t worth it.

If there’s no will to change all of the mental stats, then I’d settle for just seeing the leadership stat be tied to seasons in the league. That would be interesting I think, and would differentiate two different players at the same TPE based on how long they’ve been around. Maybe even add a bonus for players that are the captain or are assistant captains.

Fourth lines would be OK if there was no choice but to do so, but I think if there’s an effort to increase the amount of spots in the league for impact players then the preferable thing to do would be to add more teams. The only upside to fourth lines would be if locker rooms were too inactive to maintain more teams, but I’m not sure if losing one player per team would do that.

Oh, and one last thing: to have 82 games on the schedule, to make it like the NHL. But that might not be possible with FHM.