Create Account

Minnesota GM Hiring Reaction

if supreme leader cannot handle criticism they should not be supreme leader

Yesterday, 11:52 AMWaters Wrote: yeah and its belittling for me to apply to be assistant to my own job. i don't fucking care whos convincing you of what, you guys voted wrong. if you also voted this way, you are also someone who I wont forgive. does that help? you are now your own individual that I also despise. congratulations

Responding to your edit.

I have never talked with you before, nor have voted against you. I have no reasons to vote against you. 

You despise me because I did the job I was appointed to in a fake puck hobby online..?

[Image: leopride.png][Image: krojjter.gif]
[Image: YBIH.png]

Yesterday, 12:12 PMRojjter Wrote: Responding to your edit.

I have never talked with you before, nor have voted against you. I have no reasons to vote against you. 

You despise me because I did the job I was appointed to in a fake puck hobby online..?

I would assume the level of despise towards you is limited to your role as a member of the shl not you as a person?

[Image: rKRYSW6.png]


Yesterday, 12:12 PMRojjter Wrote: Responding to your edit.

I have never talked with you before, nor have voted against you. I have no reasons to vote against you. 

You despise me because I did the job I was appointed to in a fake puck hobby online..?
yes, because you didn't give me the job that I deserved in a fake puck hobby online. we're gonna use the fake puck hobby online as if you don't take this seriously too? seriously? resign then. think the shl HO should take the league seriously personally

[Image: ili5NZ2.png]


Yesterday, 12:08 PMsytarah Wrote: if supreme leader cannot handle criticism they should not be supreme leader

It seems that what you actually would prefer is for us (because it is an "us" - no one on this site is "supreme leader" and commissioner and co-commissioner votes are weighted exactly the same as other HO votes) to cave completely to all criticism. We have recently responded to a lot of criticism - we discussed our expansion rules with GMs and made adjustments based on their feedback, we've spoken to people about this hiring both publicly and privately, I worked at length with Fancey on the jobs liaison position when we received criticism regarding the job hiring processes on the site, etc. Not agreeing with every criticism offered doesn't mean we refuse to handle it.

[Image: gunnarsoderberg.gif]



[Image: DG0jZcS.png]
. : [Image: U66t7Jy.png] : .

Yesterday, 12:13 PMaleks Wrote: I would assume the level of despise towards you is limited to your role as a member of the shl not you as a person?
also this. don't know you as a person, just know you're a bad shl member

[Image: ili5NZ2.png]


Yesterday, 11:59 AMWaters Wrote: im glad rojjter is here to start a new era where we create internal warfare because we like someone slightly more than the other candidate. september 2024 was the birthdate of the cool shl


Was July 2016 the birth of "lets be toxic towards anyone that I disagree with" era of the SHL? 

I state that I did the job I was appointed to, and your response is to ridicule a person that has never even interacted with you?
Crazy

[Image: leopride.png][Image: krojjter.gif]
[Image: YBIH.png]

Yesterday, 12:13 PMsköldpaddor Wrote: It seems that what you actually would prefer is for us (because it is an "us" - no one on this site is "supreme leader" and commissioner and co-commissioner votes are weighted exactly the same as other HO votes) to cave completely to all criticism. We have recently responded to a lot of criticism - we discussed our expansion rules with GMs and made adjustments based on their feedback, we've spoken to people about this hiring both publicly and privately, I worked at length with Fancey on the jobs liaison position when we received criticism regarding the job hiring processes on the site, etc. Not agreeing with every criticism offered doesn't mean we refuse to handle it.
there is a huge middle ground between cave completely and have any sort of accountability for when you make a wrong decision, a middle ground you consider a no man's land for some reason literally every time any sort of criticism comes your way.

[Image: ili5NZ2.png]


Yesterday, 12:12 PMRojjter Wrote: Responding to your edit.

I have never talked with you before, nor have voted against you. I have no reasons to vote against you. 

You despise me because I did the job I was appointed to in a fake puck hobby online..?
there's a severe lack of emotional understanding if you're still not seeing where he's coming from

[Image: sobchak.png]

Yesterday, 12:15 PMRojjter Wrote: Was July 2016 the birth of "lets be toxic towards anyone that I disagree with" era of the SHL? 

I state that I did the job I was appointed to, and your response is to ridicule a person that has never even interacted with you?
Crazy
what did I say to ridicule you? you are soft as baby charmin, jesus christ. you put yourself in the limelight when I never addressed you at all and now you're gonna cry at me? as if I don't have reason to be mad?

[Image: ili5NZ2.png]


Yesterday, 12:15 PMWaters Wrote: there is a huge middle ground between cave completely and have any sort of accountability for when you make a wrong decision, a middle ground you consider a no man's land for some reason literally every time any sort of criticism comes your way.

I just gave you several examples of us working with people in response to criticism, I'm not sure how that can be considered a no man's land. We've publicly said "yes, we screwed up on this" in regard to more than one thing recently as well.

[Image: gunnarsoderberg.gif]



[Image: DG0jZcS.png]
. : [Image: U66t7Jy.png] : .

Yesterday, 12:17 PMsköldpaddor Wrote: I just gave you several examples of us working with people in response to criticism, I'm not sure how that can be considered a no man's land. We've publicly said "yes, we screwed up on this" in regard to more than one thing recently as well.
not this though!

[Image: ili5NZ2.png]


Yesterday, 12:13 PMaleks Wrote: I would assume the level of despise towards you is limited to your role as a member of the shl not you as a person?

Well Waters is doing everything in his power to make it sound like something else.

Also, this is a hobby. I'm not here to get brigaded by some circlejerk, sorry for trying to communicate. I'll let you guys ponder in peace.

"Why don't HO ever communicate"

[Image: leopride.png][Image: krojjter.gif]
[Image: YBIH.png]

Swim Practice is at 8PM tonight for me guys. Let's slow it down.

[Image: hallsy.png]

Yesterday, 12:18 PMRojjter Wrote: Well Waters is doing everything in his power to make it sound like something else.

Also, this is a hobby. I'm not here to get brigaded by some circlejerk, sorry for trying to communicate. I'll let you guys ponder in peace.

"Why don't HO ever communicate"
I'm sorry. you're so right. hey rojjter. i am upset that you made a decision that made me very upset and was extremely hurtful to me as a user. what will you do to rectify this? nothing?




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)




Navigation

 

Extra Menu

 

About us

The Simulation Hockey League is a free online forums based sim league where you create your own fantasy hockey player. Join today and create your player, become a GM, get drafted, sign contracts, make trades and compete against hundreds of players from around the world.