Login

Samsung virtual assistant · 02-19-2019, 08:14 PM

Tbh let the J pay the salary of the send-downs too.

Wawazat · 02-19-2019, 08:18 PM

02-19-2019, 07:49 PMToeDragon84 Wrote: the downsides of your team spending 9M on 2 regressing IFAs who'd cost $4M at minimum.

By IFA you mean "Inactive" right?
What if there was a "relief claim" that a team could apply to these IFA's and it would immediately drop them to the 500k base.

TheWoZy · 02-19-2019, 08:18 PM

02-19-2019, 06:47 PMluketd Wrote: increase cap

meh the money would be use on good FA

ToeDragon84 · 02-19-2019, 09:13 PM

02-19-2019, 08:18 PMWawazat Wrote:
02-19-2019, 07:49 PMToeDragon84 Wrote: the downsides of your team spending 9M on 2 regressing IFAs who'd cost $4M at minimum.

By IFA you mean "Inactive" right?
What if there was a "relief claim" that a team could apply to these IFA's and it would immediately drop them to the 500k base.

Yeah inactive.

Dropping to 500k for every inactive wouldn't be good. It'd be a blessing on teams cap when good users go inactive, they'd have amazing deals on players.

Wawazat · 02-19-2019, 09:49 PM

02-19-2019, 09:13 PMToeDragon84 Wrote:
02-19-2019, 08:18 PMWawazat Wrote: By IFA you mean "Inactive" right?
What if there was a "relief claim" that a team could apply to these IFA's and it would immediately drop them to the 500k base.
Yeah inactive.

Dropping to 500k for every inactive wouldn't be good. It'd be a blessing on teams cap when good users go inactive, they'd have amazing deals on players.

Ok, what it was limited to no more than two (2) per season and could only be for Regressing IFA's

Keygan · 02-19-2019, 10:08 PM

02-19-2019, 07:49 PMToeDragon84 Wrote: the downsides of your team spending 9M on 2 regressing IFAs who'd cost $4M at minimum.

9m instead of 8m?

We offered him 3/3/3 and it's not enough. I got other prospects I gotta pay.

Nerio · 02-19-2019, 10:24 PM

To be honest it is weird to get less when you "make it" so to speak. There are definitely some RPG elements to this entire experience and that's one that falls super flat. Make juniors give less and cost less for gear/training, or make SHL give more and cost more for gear/training. Either way there's a way to keep the current economy while making it feel like a progressive experience if someone is willing to put a little brain power to it.

kit · 02-19-2019, 10:49 PM

Expand again imo

GeckoeyGecko · 02-19-2019, 10:56 PM

Nuke SMJHL budget

ml002 · 02-19-2019, 11:21 PM

02-19-2019, 10:56 PMGeckoeyGecko Wrote: Nuke SMJHL budget

You mean the send down budget right?

Credit to Copenhagen, Wasty, FlappyGiraffe, InciteHysteria, and caltroit_red_flames
[Image: MM4nqx6.png]

ToeDragon84 · 02-19-2019, 11:37 PM

02-19-2019, 09:49 PMWawazat Wrote:
02-19-2019, 09:13 PMToeDragon84 Wrote: Yeah inactive.

Dropping to 500k for every inactive wouldn't be good. It'd be a blessing on teams cap when good users go inactive, they'd have amazing deals on players.

Ok, what it was limited to no more than two (2) per season and could only be for Regressing IFA's

It'd be a disadvantage to use a fully active roster, the best situation for teams would be having two good guys go inactive when they regress, spend $1M on them and get a bunch of space.

The couple high TPE inactives would be some of the most valuable guys in the league, they already are pretty valuable to begin with having control over them in FA. With all that excessive cap you'd only need one or two to get a pretty great advantage. i can see it dropping to TPE minimum, but potentially spending 500K on someone who should cost 3-5M would be too good of a deal for teams while everyone else has to follow TPE minimums.

02-19-2019, 10:08 PMKeygan Wrote:
02-19-2019, 07:49 PMToeDragon84 Wrote: the downsides of your team spending 9M on 2 regressing IFAs who'd cost $4M at minimum.

9m instead of 8m?

We offered him 3/3/3 and it's not enough. I got other prospects I gotta pay.

9 for Hammermark/Glover who'd cost 2m each at min.

ToeDragon84 · 02-19-2019, 11:44 PM

02-19-2019, 10:24 PMNerio Wrote: To be honest it is weird to get less when you "make it" so to speak. There are definitely some RPG elements to this entire experience and that's one that falls super flat. Make juniors give less and cost less for gear/training, or make SHL give more and cost more for gear/training. Either way there's a way to keep the current economy while making it feel like a progressive experience if someone is willing to put a little brain power to it.

You went to Buffalo along with seven other guys, that's probably why you're being offered less than in junior.

White Cornerback · 02-19-2019, 11:49 PM

02-19-2019, 11:44 PMToeDragon84 Wrote:
02-19-2019, 10:24 PMNerio Wrote: To be honest it is weird to get less when you "make it" so to speak. There are definitely some RPG elements to this entire experience and that's one that falls super flat. Make juniors give less and cost less for gear/training, or make SHL give more and cost more for gear/training. Either way there's a way to keep the current economy while making it feel like a progressive experience if someone is willing to put a little brain power to it.
You went to Buffalo along with seven other guys, that's probably why you're being offered less than in junior.

whos the jackass on Buffalo on a big salary

Keygan · 02-19-2019, 11:58 PM

02-19-2019, 11:37 PMToeDragon84 Wrote:
02-19-2019, 10:08 PMKeygan Wrote: 9m instead of 8m?

We offered him 3/3/3 and it's not enough. I got other prospects I gotta pay.

9 for Hammermark/Glover who'd cost 2m each at min.

Whoops I interpreted it as 4m a pop.

Wawazat · 02-20-2019, 12:01 AM

TY @ToeDragon84 for that knowledge.

[Image: 100313_be_enlightened.gif]

Navigation

Extra Menu

About us