10-28-2018, 10:00 PMkit Wrote: Yet he’s the only one to be involved in both, and rumor has it he had a large part in writing the two up
Isn’t this a rumour that you just started?
No sir! Have heard it from different sources each time. It’s also pretty well known that tdz is very against anything that could be even remotely deemed as offensive. And the fact that he refuses to comment on this despite the fact that people would like him to, it all adds up to a suspicious situation.
If you don’t think it’s just TDZ have you talked with the HO as a whole on this suspending tirade they have been for a while now?
10-28-2018, 10:08 PMEggy216 Wrote: Isn’t this a rumour that you just started?
No sir! Have heard it from different sources each time. It’s also pretty well known that tdz is very against anything that could be even remotely deemed as offensive. And the fact that he refuses to comment on this despite the fact that people would like him to, it all adds up to a suspicious situation.
If you don’t think it’s just TDZ have you talked with the HO as a whole on this suspending tirade they have been for a while now?
TDZ would have banned Buffalo a long time ago if he wanted offensive things out of the SHL imo.
10-28-2018, 10:10 PMkit Wrote: No sir! Have heard it from different sources each time. It’s also pretty well known that tdz is very against anything that could be even remotely deemed as offensive. And the fact that he refuses to comment on this despite the fact that people would like him to, it all adds up to a suspicious situation.
If you don’t think it’s just TDZ have you talked with the HO as a whole on this suspending tirade they have been for a while now?
TDZ would have banned Buffalo a long time ago if he wanted offensive things out of the SHL imo.
10-28-2018, 10:10 PMkit Wrote: No sir! Have heard it from different sources each time. It’s also pretty well known that tdz is very against anything that could be even remotely deemed as offensive. And the fact that he refuses to comment on this despite the fact that people would like him to, it all adds up to a suspicious situation.
If you don’t think it’s just TDZ have you talked with the HO as a whole on this suspending tirade they have been for a while now?
TDZ would have banned Buffalo a long time ago if he wanted offensive things out of the SHL imo.
Only a matter of time eh?
With the way things are going, more and more will be suspendable until HO can basically do whatever they want.
You also basically just admitted that tdz has wayyy too much power in head office if he has the ability to just ban most of s team, and the only reason he hasn’t is because he doesn’t want to. SHL heading in a dangerous direction, and I implore the head office to release this suspension thread so that the shl members can make an informed decision, without just being told what to think by the head office, or this league will be heading toward the afterlife
10-28-2018, 10:14 PMDangles13 Wrote: TDZ would have banned Buffalo a long time ago if he wanted offensive things out of the SHL imo.
Only a matter of time eh?
With the way things are going, more and more will be suspendable until HO can basically do whatever they want.
You also basically just admitted that tdz has wayyy too much power in head office if he has the ability to just ban most of s team, and the only reason he hasn’t is because he doesn’t want to. SHL heading in a dangerous direction, and I implore the head office to release this suspension thread so that the shl members can make an informed decision, without just being told what to think by the head office, or this league will be heading toward the afterlife
Though, I dont think one person can have all this power that you are saying there is. There is a voting process and a debating process in HO, I dont think TDZ can control something he doesnt have a majority on. The whole point of HO is to not have one ruler to project his rules on everyone, its a group decision. In the end, everyone has to vote, not just him.
10-28-2018, 10:14 PMDangles13 Wrote: TDZ would have banned Buffalo a long time ago if he wanted offensive things out of the SHL imo.
Only a matter of time eh?
With the way things are going, more and more will be suspendable until HO can basically do whatever they want.
You also basically just admitted that tdz has wayyy too much power in head office if he has the ability to just ban most of s team, and the only reason he hasn’t is because he doesn’t want to. SHL heading in a dangerous direction, and I implore the head office to release this suspension thread so that the shl members can make an informed decision, without just being told what to think by the head office, or this league will be heading toward the afterlife
HO can do whatever they want, as can any other member. Free world and all that.
10-28-2018, 10:08 PMEggy216 Wrote: Isn’t this a rumour that you just started?
No sir! Have heard it from different sources each time. It’s also pretty well known that tdz is very against anything that could be even remotely deemed as offensive. And the fact that he refuses to comment on this despite the fact that people would like him to, it all adds up to a suspicious situation.
If you don’t think it’s just TDZ have you talked with the HO as a whole on this suspending tirade they have been for a while now?
I beg to differ on calling this a “suspending tirade.” We’re referring to two situations 3 months (roughly, making an estimate knowing it’s offseason-offseason) apart. I would actually say that’s lower than we saw back in the day, even if the specific numbers in each situation have been a little higher than leafs and I believe they should be.
Truly, the punishments given to those three are what the rulebook says can be given for baiting (as an aside, I take issue with the description of the situation as “abuse of the reputation function”, but I guess that’s what happens when one person writes the actual post and nobody proofreads it), so I don’t think they necessarily erred in their action. I actually took the conversation back to them right before announcing it, and everyone agreed with the assessment Leafs and I made on the appeal so they understand our thought process as well.
So to get back to your original question, yes I’ve spoken to the team about what happened here.
LW - Rainbow Dash - Updates
[img=0x0]https://i.imgur.com/eM6YKiW.gif[/img]
Rainbow Dash Fan S24-Present
SHL Commissioner S34-S52
New England Wolfpack GM S30-S40
Montreal Milita Co-GM S26-S29
10-28-2018, 10:14 PMDangles13 Wrote: TDZ would have banned Buffalo a long time ago if he wanted offensive things out of the SHL imo.
Only a matter of time eh?
With the way things are going, more and more will be suspendable until HO can basically do whatever they want.
You also basically just admitted that tdz has wayyy too much power in head office if he has the ability to just ban most of s team, and the only reason he hasn’t is because he doesn’t want to. SHL heading in a dangerous direction, and I implore the head office to release this suspension thread so that the shl members can make an informed decision, without just being told what to think by the head office, or this league will be heading toward the afterlife
Just give it up man, you're the only one still making a stink about it.
10-28-2018, 10:10 PMkit Wrote: No sir! Have heard it from different sources each time. It’s also pretty well known that tdz is very against anything that could be even remotely deemed as offensive. And the fact that he refuses to comment on this despite the fact that people would like him to, it all adds up to a suspicious situation.
If you don’t think it’s just TDZ have you talked with the HO as a whole on this suspending tirade they have been for a while now?
I beg to differ on calling this a “suspending tirade.” We’re referring to two situations 3 months (roughly, making an estimate knowing it’s offseason-offseason) apart. I would actually say that’s lower than we saw back in the day, even if the specific numbers in each situation have been a little higher than leafs and I believe they should be.
Truly, the punishments given to those three are what the rulebook says can be given for baiting (as an aside, I take issue with the description of the situation as “abuse of the reputation function”, but I guess that’s what happens when one person writes the actual post and nobody proofreads it), so I don’t think they necessarily erred in their action. I actually took the conversation back to them right before announcing it, and everyone agreed with the assessment Leafs and I made on the appeal so they understand our thought process as well.
So to get back to your original question, yes I’ve spoken to the team about what happened here.
So if they all agreed then why was the suspension even the way it was in the first place??
10-28-2018, 10:19 PMkit Wrote: Only a matter of time eh?
With the way things are going, more and more will be suspendable until HO can basically do whatever they want.
You also basically just admitted that tdz has wayyy too much power in head office if he has the ability to just ban most of s team, and the only reason he hasn’t is because he doesn’t want to. SHL heading in a dangerous direction, and I implore the head office to release this suspension thread so that the shl members can make an informed decision, without just being told what to think by the head office, or this league will be heading toward the afterlife
Just give it up man, you're the only one still making a stink about it.
Keygan ily but in my opinion, and many others, the league is heading in a dangerous direction, and I’m not just gonna sit quietly despite the fact that you and some others would like me to. Sorry