|
TOR Cap Overage
|
FrenchieSMJHL GM allegedly doing stuff
Good morning SHL,
It was brought to the attention of Head Office that the Toronto North Stars began the season with several players not under contract. While investigating this/deliberating on appropriate disciplinary measures (the rulebook currently does not specify a consequence for rostering players not under contract, so we needed time to discuss and research precedent), Toronto was instructed to sign those players in order to play them legally. It was determined during this investigation that, due to contract tier adjustments, Toronto would not have been able to legally sign those players (players who had already begun the season on Toronto’s roster and had played a full week of sims), as they would not have had the cap space to do so. While calculating this, we also discovered that TOR had been assessed a fine (for releasing an active player) that was $500,000 higher than it should have been. When all the math was said and done, the final cap overage was calculated at $5,000,000. In accordance with the rulebook (Section II, Subsection C, Rule 6), Toronto will be issued a fine of $10,000,000 (twice the surplus) towards next season’s cap (S80). Ordinarily, Toronto would be required to rectify this situation prior to the next sim, but due to the late hour at which this was determined/finalized and the GMs were able to be notified, as well as the early sim time for this day's sim, TOR will be given 24 hours from the time of this post to become cap compliant. As always, Toronto (@mcgriddleluver and @jaypc8237) may appeal this decision and can send an appeal request to any head of the appeals committee, currently @DrunkenTeddy and @Leafs4ever. Any appeal should be filed within 48 hours of publication of this punishment. On behalf of SHL HO, Frenchie ![[Image: image.png]](https://i.ibb.co/X4WGR17/image.png) ![[Image: lap-teamsig.png]](https://i.ibb.co/MgFr5BT/lap-teamsig.png) @jason kranz sig elite / @sulovilen elite sig
[pbl[S73 - IRE - 8 W | 0 OTW | 4 L - Lost in Round 1[/pbl]
   ![[Image: YBIH.png]](https://i.ibb.co/R4pMBYY/YBIH.png) 
ZootTXFantasy League Manager Posting Freak
TheOPSquidTrading Card Team Posting Freak
crazy high fine wow
![[Image: TheOPSquid.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/TheOPSquid.gif) ![[Image: v2ZHYxx.png]](https://i.imgur.com/v2ZHYxx.png) ]
| 36 GP | 10 G | 18 A | 28 P | -9 | 12 PIM | 91 H
All Time in Points for Yukon
All Time in Assists for Yukon
All Time in Penalty Minutes for Yukon
All Time in Hits for Yukon
Gold Rush Award - Led Team in Points
[pbl]SHL Draft - 7th OVR to Seattle
HabsFanFromOntarioSHL GM S30 Cup Champion Never Going To Win A Cup 4 hours agoSeany148 Wrote: $10M?! That's half a year of @Waters salary Less than a third, peasant money. “The Wheel of Time turns, and Ages come and pass, leaving memories that become legend. Legend fades to myth, and even myth is long forgotten when the Age that gave it birth comes again. ... There are neither beginnings nor endings to the Wheel of Time. But it was a beginning.”
![[Image: HFFO.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/HFFO.gif)
RAmenAmenSMJHL GM Posting Freak 4 hours agoTheOPSquid Wrote: crazy high fine wow It's extremely light, since the incomplete GM tasks associated with player movement and signings also warrant the loss of all GM pay, a 2nd and 3rd round pick, and an additional $2M cap penalty, none of which have been assessed. ![[Image: RAmenAmen.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/RAmenAmen.gif) sig credit: Ragnar, Sulovilen, Enigmatic, Bayley ![[Image: kcP9WEd.png]](https://i.imgur.com/kcP9WEd.png) ![[Image: DNLeeu0.png]](https://i.imgur.com/DNLeeu0.png) ![[Image: DKMMlC3.png]](http://i.imgur.com/DKMMlC3.png) ![[Image: RAmenAmenPride.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/RAmenAmenPride.gif)
sköldpaddorCommissioner Turtle Lord 2 hours agoRAmenAmen Wrote: It's extremely light, since the incomplete GM tasks associated with player movement and signings also warrant the loss of all GM pay, a 2nd and 3rd round pick, and an additional $2M cap penalty, none of which have been assessed. As I explained to you directly when we talked about it, there were additional factors and precedent in play that impacted this decision. In the past, clear intent to sign contracts *has* impacted HO punishments, and in this case, all of the players were paid this season, and everyone, including head office, budget, the GMs in question, and the players in question, were under the impression that the contracts had been signed. This is the primary reason we elected to levy the (heavier) cap overage penalty instead of the "late GM tasks" punishment (which is also not clearly prescribed in the rulebook for playing players without a contract, and is something we are looking to rectify with further rulebook updates.) ![[Image: gunnarsoderberg.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/gunnarsoderberg.gif) ![[Image: xJXeYmQ.png]](https://i.imgur.com/xJXeYmQ.png) ![[Image: DG0jZcS.png]](https://i.imgur.com/DG0jZcS.png) . : ![[Image: 7MO9RpC.png]](http://i.imgur.com/7MO9RpC.png) : .
RAmenAmenSMJHL GM Posting Freak 2 hours agosköldpaddor Wrote: As I explained to you directly when we talked about it, there were additional factors and precedent in play that impacted this decision. In the past, clear intent to sign contracts *has* impacted HO punishments, and in this case, all of the players were paid this season, and everyone, including head office, budget, the GMs in question, and the players in question, were under the impression that the contracts had been signed. This is the primary reason we elected to levy the (heavier) cap overage penalty instead of the "late GM tasks" punishment (which is also not clearly prescribed in the rulebook for playing players without a contract, and is something we are looking to rectify with further rulebook updates.) And that's HO's prerogative to do, but I think it's a fair argument to say that the budget clearly wasn't compliant one way or the other if they were both unsigned *and* over the cap, which was required to be done before the start of the season. If there are mitigating circumstances then HO certainly has the right to give a lighter punishment (as they did), but it *is* a lighter punishment than what the rulebook would allow. sig credit: Ragnar, Sulovilen, Enigmatic, Bayley
sköldpaddorCommissioner Turtle Lord 2 hours agoRAmenAmen Wrote: And that's HO's prerogative to do, but I think it's a fair argument to say that the budget clearly wasn't compliant one way or the other if they were both unsigned *and* over the cap, which was required to be done before the start of the season. If there are mitigating circumstances then HO certainly has the right to give a lighter punishment (as they did), but it *is* a lighter punishment than what the rulebook would allow. When the rulebook is not clear on something, we do tend to look to past established precedent in order to determine what a fair ruling will be in the context of how others have been punished for similar offenses in the future. It is worth nothing that they were *not* over the cap with the players not signed. If we say the players weren't signed in time, then the "over the cap" punishment does not kick in at all, and we could call it "late GM task" if that's what we wanted, but if the players weren't signed, they're not over cap, they just have an illegal roster (which does not have a rulebook punishment aside from us labeling it a missed GM task - and again, we're going to fix that). When it was discovered that they were not signed, TOR was instructed to sign the players immediately in order to avoid continuing to play with an illegal roster. It was after that point, when we had already said "get it done pronto" that it was determined that doing so would put them over cap this season. I don't think there is a legal justification for levying both punishments here. If the players weren't signed in time, they're not over cap. If the players *are* considered signed, as it is clear the intent was to do (since the players were already paid by the team this season), then they are over cap, but the task wasn't missed. In light of the complexities there, and due to the severity of the issue, we elected to rule in favor of the more severe punishment, but I do not see a world where both punishments would have been issued. . : : .
RAmenAmenSMJHL GM Posting Freak 2 hours agosköldpaddor Wrote: When the rulebook is not clear on something, we do tend to look to past established precedent in order to determine what a fair ruling will be in the context of how others have been punished for similar offenses in the future. If that's the case then I'm not sure I understand the "clear intent to sign contracts" part of the justification. Did the team intend to be over the cap and have that in their budget, or was the entire thing incomplete? sig credit: Ragnar, Sulovilen, Enigmatic, Bayley
sköldpaddorCommissioner Turtle Lord 2 hours agoRAmenAmen Wrote: If that's the case then I'm not sure I understand the "clear intent to sign contracts" part of the justification. Did the team intend to be over the cap and have that in their budget, or was the entire thing incomplete? The team budget was incorrect, largely as a result of miscommunications during the GM transition, but the budget team budget was also incorrect in a completely different way, and neither budget showed the correct contract amount for several players OR the correct cap overage amount, which we (HO) had to investigate and rectify before we could even be sure what we were looking at. . : : .
SburbineSMJHL GM That boy ain't right
FaraDianAll-Star Committee The All-Tsar
SburbineSMJHL GM That boy ain't right |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: zootshl.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/zootshl.gif)
![[Image: jO2Di2N.png]](https://i.imgur.com/jO2Di2N.png)
![[Image: Voi7GNj.png]](https://i.imgur.com/Voi7GNj.png)
![[Image: 3NfeQdx.png]](https://i.imgur.com/3NfeQdx.png)
![[Image: rFu52UT.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/rFu52UT.jpeg)
![[Image: YpRQWIT.png]](https://i.imgur.com/YpRQWIT.png)
![[Image: SyiOY8U.png]](http://i.imgur.com/SyiOY8U.png)
![[Image: showthread.php?tid=126581%5D]](https://i.imgur.com/KS8UYv9.png%5B/url%5D%5Burl=https://simulationhockey.com/showthread.php?tid=126581%5D)
![[Image: ywpNoYb.png]](http://i.imgur.com/ywpNoYb.png)
| Users browsing this thread: |
| SDCore, Whitecap, 5 Guest(s) |
