08-21-2019, 07:49 PMFinnRhys Wrote:

08-21-2019, 07:36 PMBlastmeaway Wrote: We do not currently have an enforced system for what updates should look like. Its funny you bring that up because this is something that has been on our radar for a little bit now and we have been discussing that.

Straw poll of one, me, I would totally be in favor of a mandated format. If it makes updaters jobs easier and is easy for me to use without making mistakes then I'm all for it.

For some reason I thought the example in the "create a player" thread was mandated but I guess not.

The issue I have noticed is that some people are set in their ways and any slight deviation means the world is ending and if they can't update their way then we have obviously started a fascist regime aimed specifically at them. Just as an updater perspective there are a lot of updates where we try and work with people instead of straight our rejecting them for the week because we know that would suck. Nothing about that is required but the precedent with Silvers punishment above seems to enforce that as part of the job. If I can be fined for not mentioning that you did your math wrong(I think most of us do this unless we forget anyway), despite me putting the correct math in on our end and updating the player page to reflect it; then it feels safer to just reject an update.