![]() |
Updated: Changes to Regression - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: SHL Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=27) +---- Thread: Updated: Changes to Regression (/showthread.php?tid=120573) |
RE: Changes to Regression - brickwall35 - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 12:54 PMluketd Wrote: Instead of working on their own product and seeing if there is something they could do better/differently on how users build their players, how the update scale works, are the PT´s interesting or challenging enough, is the TPE handed out too much etc etc, SHL opened the door to other leagues to come in and water down everything. With this ´improvement´, less people will do the actual PT´s here, which is worrying since you can have a solid career without writing media or having a job - basically giving a free ticket to be a top player by teaming up with other leagues, doing the minimum now gives you a lot more than in the past - that is wrong and only benefits the other leagues. SHL drops down to their level, instead of closing the door and kicking the snakes from other leagues out of power. Whoever even suggested anything like this should be fired right away. ´Hey I got an idea, lets help other leagues be more active... huh, what? No, we mention your name in there as well and promote it as something that will help everybody´ And you went with it.Is this fresh pasta? RE: Changes to Regression - CampinKiller - 12-03-2021 HO admitting a mistake would require these changes to be a mistake in the first place. Everyone is too attached to the number. There will be less TPE and everyone in those classes will still be on top - just with less TPE RE: Changes to Regression - Count Chocula - 12-03-2021 12-02-2021, 06:16 PMToast Wrote:12-02-2021, 06:02 PMAcsolap Wrote: I mean Kirkby played the majority of his career at 50 games per season. Is it unfair that you all had full careers of 66 games? No, that's just the way she goes. 54 will still have more tpe than every other class. In fact they'll still have more or less the same tpe Kirkby did at his peak because of the vast inflation of tpe over the last few seasons. Couldn't agree more, I joined late into the J s53 since the spare pandemic time. I worked my ass off going from 45th overall to the top 15 earners of the s54 class. I've been eyeballing the 2k mark to get the forum badge and because I fell just short with my first player. I would have finally reached it next season. Now I don't even get a season at the top after all my hard work and dedication. It's disrespectful and has essentially ruined my motivation moving forward to the point where I'm leaning towards not recreating. The HO contradicts their own plans and vision and 2 classes are the main collateral damage for it. RE: Changes to Regression - Acsolap - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 12:52 PMEvok Wrote: HO admitting they made a mistake would be a first lmao. I'm still waiting for @"TommySalami" amazing research results, probably not biased at all, to see why this was needed to be implemented that way Not really fair to pin your frustrations on Tommy, there was significant work put into this. For what it's worth GM chat, an often spicy place, was largely nonplussed by the changes outside of two or three members. RE: Changes to Regression - Bfine - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 12:54 PMluketd Wrote: Instead of working on their own product and seeing if there is something they could do better/differently on how users build their players, how the update scale works, are the PT´s interesting or challenging enough, is the TPE handed out too much etc etc, SHL opened the door to other leagues to come in and water down everything. With this ´improvement´, less people will do the actual PT´s here, which is worrying since you can have a solid career without writing media or having a job - basically giving a free ticket to be a top player by teaming up with other leagues, doing the minimum now gives you a lot more than in the past - that is wrong and only benefits the other leagues. SHL drops down to their level, instead of closing the door and kicking the snakes from other leagues out of power. Whoever even suggested anything like this should be fired right away. ´Hey I got an idea, lets help other leagues be more active... huh, what? No, we mention your name in there as well and promote it as something that will help everybody´ And you went with it.Affiliate PT's are not in any way the issue with the SHL at the moment. It's an easy way to get PBE, ISFL, and WSBL people interested in the SHL and save them a bit of time, and at the same time can help people branch out into other leagues (I joined the ISFL in large part due to affiliate TPE and it's been great so far). The SHL becoming insular from the rest of the sim league community doesn't benefit anyone in any way. RE: Changes to Regression - ACapitalChicago - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 12:58 PMbrickwall35 Wrote:12-03-2021, 12:54 PMluketd Wrote: Instead of working on their own product and seeing if there is something they could do better/differently on how users build their players, how the update scale works, are the PT´s interesting or challenging enough, is the TPE handed out too much etc etc, SHL opened the door to other leagues to come in and water down everything. With this ´improvement´, less people will do the actual PT´s here, which is worrying since you can have a solid career without writing media or having a job - basically giving a free ticket to be a top player by teaming up with other leagues, doing the minimum now gives you a lot more than in the past - that is wrong and only benefits the other leagues. SHL drops down to their level, instead of closing the door and kicking the snakes from other leagues out of power. Whoever even suggested anything like this should be fired right away. ´Hey I got an idea, lets help other leagues be more active... huh, what? No, we mention your name in there as well and promote it as something that will help everybody´ And you went with it.Is this fresh pasta? Could've sworn this is very old pasta RE: Changes to Regression - Bfine - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 01:06 PMACapitalChicago Wrote:Wait did I get baited? Damn it.12-03-2021, 12:58 PMbrickwall35 Wrote: Is this fresh pasta? RE: Changes to Regression - ACapitalChicago - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 01:07 PMBfine Wrote:12-03-2021, 01:06 PMACapitalChicago Wrote: Could've sworn this is very old pastaWait did I get baited? Damn it. I'm 90% sure it's back from when we first announced affiliate claims. So yes RE: Changes to Regression - Evok - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 01:00 PMAcsolap Wrote:12-03-2021, 12:52 PMEvok Wrote: HO admitting they made a mistake would be a first lmao. I'm still waiting for @"TommySalami" amazing research results, probably not biased at all, to see why this was needed to be implemented that way Tommy was the one to say they had some research? Anyone is able to provide it, i dont care, but since hes the only one who mentioned it, yes, hes the one i'm asking that he provide it. I cant ask people who don't know what research he mention. Maybe you can provide it then? Not saying he biased it, but wouldnt be surprised ho took what they wanted of it. RE: Changes to Regression - caltroit_red_flames - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 01:07 PMBfine Wrote: Wait did I get baited? Damn it. 12-03-2021, 01:09 PMACapitalChicago Wrote: I'm 90% sure it's back from when we first announced affiliate claims. So yes Baited hard. @Beaver would be proud @"luketd" https://simulationhockey.com/showthread.php?tid=88401&pid=2479595#pid2479595 RE: Changes to Regression - Fitted2106 - 12-03-2021 Drunk media incoming once I figure out how to get drunk RE: Changes to Regression - Katth - 12-03-2021 As it has never been possible to play with a peak build would it be an idea that players can play with a peak build in their 10th season? They can earn TPE, but have to bank it and hit them with 20% or 22% regression in their 11th season. RE: Changes to Regression - Bfine - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 01:19 PMcaltroit_red_flames Wrote:Oh no its Ruutu bait too? I retire12-03-2021, 01:07 PMBfine Wrote: Wait did I get baited? Damn it. RE: Changes to Regression - ACapitalChicago - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 01:19 PMcaltroit_red_flames Wrote:12-03-2021, 01:07 PMBfine Wrote: Wait did I get baited? Damn it. Oh my god of course it's a ruutu post RE: Changes to Regression - leafsftw1967 - 12-03-2021 12-03-2021, 01:00 PMCount Chocula Wrote:12-02-2021, 06:16 PMToast Wrote: You peaked at over 2100TPE. 54s just had their opportunity to get even one season at above 2000 robbed from them. You could not have summed it up in a better way and share those exact thoughts |