HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: Suspensions/Punishments (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=226) +---- Thread: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings (/showthread.php?tid=118564) |
RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Symmetrik - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:09 AMPatty Wrote:08-21-2021, 12:06 AMSymmetrik Wrote: Ok, how does Hamilton not even lose GM pay for missing the deadline. That's been a standard punishment for several seasons now for GM errors. have i just been hacked that was really weird it was just a giant text string RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Patty - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:10 AMSymmetrik Wrote:not my best copy paste work.08-21-2021, 12:09 AMPatty Wrote: most of the punishments you can get for certain infractions are laid out in the rulebook. i didn't even get the right section rip RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - SlashACM - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:01 AMfishy Wrote:08-20-2021, 11:51 PMSlashACM Wrote: There was one cheating incident that was aptly punished don't really know what your point is So the one incident is the same incident it was just for two games, that was a mistake by me and me alone. S55 G7 is linked to an earlier preseason incident involving Chicago's lines so it's hard to pin that on Nola RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Pythonic - 08-21-2021 08-20-2021, 11:48 PMThelastheraclid Wrote:wait fr?08-20-2021, 11:38 PMPythonic Wrote: oh also, thread team i'm glad my noob ass could make u apart of ur first thread team RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - ToeDragon84 - 08-21-2021 08-20-2021, 11:51 PMSlashACM Wrote:what'd you do08-20-2021, 11:13 PMfishy Wrote: To Joe specifically, let’s get off your high horse. NOLA is not exactly the standard for a team with strong morals and good values or have we already forgotten your cheating incidents in the playoffs in the mid S50s? RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Evok - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:13 AMPatty Wrote:08-21-2021, 12:10 AMSymmetrik Wrote: have i just been hackednot my best copy paste work. wait i though the rulebook was not the way to go and i should only go with my interpretation of it RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Pythonic - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:05 AMroastpuff Wrote:u sure as hell weren't when i made the team08-20-2021, 11:38 PMPythonic Wrote: oh also, thread team RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - SlashACM - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:16 AMToeDragon84 Wrote:08-20-2021, 11:51 PMSlashACM Wrote: There was one cheating incident that was aptly punished don't really know what your point iswhat'd you do 3rd line wit no C baybeee RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Pythonic - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:16 AMToeDragon84 Wrote:your mom08-20-2021, 11:51 PMSlashACM Wrote: There was one cheating incident that was aptly punished don't really know what your point iswhat'd you do RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Leafs4ever - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:00 AMToast Wrote:08-20-2021, 09:11 PMLeafs4ever Wrote: ‘Bout what? 1. We just felt time was of the essence in this situation. 2. Punishment was based off a prior punishment related to missed GM tasks, but added on the probation and went from 1 day late to 3 days late because there were 3 prospects. 3. There was discussion about their 2nd being so late, yes. I'm not sure how to respond to the second part. What if the current GMs are still GMs by that time? 4. They signed their prospects before the deadline, that was more important. The reason for the rule in the first place was to stop GMs from hording players. It's very clear that wasn't the case here. 5. Again, not really sure how to answer this one either. However, Nour and Luke are the leaders of this league. If they don't like how this played out they are free to change it to something else. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - Symmetrik - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:13 AMPatty Wrote:08-21-2021, 12:10 AMSymmetrik Wrote: have i just been hackednot my best copy paste work. but like even look at the thread before this one, is people not paying their players, which posting contracts for payment is a GM task, no? Missing regression (like the manhattan punishment on the first page) would be late for regression right? but they were fined, didn't follow the pick rule. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - zaynzk - 08-21-2021 @DrunkenTeddysmall potatoes RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - JumpierPegasus - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:09 AMnour Wrote:08-21-2021, 12:00 AMZoone16 Wrote: Considering one of the prospects in question was Nour's very own recreate, isn't that a massive conflict of interest? Did he recuse himself from this? Looks photoshopped RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - spooked - 08-21-2021 08-21-2021, 12:23 AMSymmetrik Wrote:08-21-2021, 12:13 AMPatty Wrote: not my best copy paste work. Late Task rules are awkward to apply because they usually imply something was missed in whole (no portion was completed, which is why after 5 days they get fired), which is almost never the case. So the punishments are usually discussed based on what is in the rules as well as what has been most similar in the past as a precedent. We usually review past punishments to make sure we are in line with what has been done in the past. RE: HAM Punishment and Ruling on Draftee Signings - SewingWithNancy - 08-21-2021 Wow, the vets told me that ham wouldn’t be punished at all, and I thought they were all cynical. But turns out they were correct. As someone that had zero dog in this fight I’m disgusted with this outcome. Why do I even try in this league if this is how things are handled. Fuck this |