![]() |
Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Printable Version +- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: SHL Announcements (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=27) +---- Thread: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression (/showthread.php?tid=100654) |
RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - ztevans - 10-22-2019 Can we literally have one thread without someone calling for blood? RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Samsung virtual assistant - 10-22-2019 10-22-2019, 08:32 PMztevans Wrote: Can we literally have one thread without someone calling for blood? Banned. RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - WannabeFinn - 10-22-2019 Lol The Augment strikes again RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - White Cornerback - 10-22-2019 10-22-2019, 08:25 PMMike Izzy Wrote:10-22-2019, 07:49 PMAvakael Wrote: Oh, and every updater who let me do it, too. The most protest I ever got was one updater who said I couldn't add the next seasons equipment in there, but he was overruled by his boss. Might need to just accept that it wasn't remotely considered against the rules. If you want to change the rules now, fine- we can happily work within them. If you want to retroactively apply them, you've got an awful lot of players to penalise. cook my some bacon motherfucking clown RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Zombiewolf - 10-22-2019 Lmfaooooo of course this spirals down to "Fuck WBF" I just can't even RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Samsung virtual assistant - 10-22-2019 This site needs to be more like China, who banned Pewdiepie for making Winnie the Pooh jokes. RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - White Cornerback - 10-22-2019 ![]() RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Avakael - 10-22-2019 10-22-2019, 08:25 PMMike Izzy Wrote:10-22-2019, 07:49 PMAvakael Wrote: Oh, and every updater who let me do it, too. The most protest I ever got was one updater who said I couldn't add the next seasons equipment in there, but he was overruled by his boss. Might need to just accept that it wasn't remotely considered against the rules. If you want to change the rules now, fine- we can happily work within them. If you want to retroactively apply them, you've got an awful lot of players to penalise. But that's the point. It wasn't against the rules. The only reason why you thought it was against the rules was because you didn't understand the rules. I haven't done anything that is considered cheating- like holding off on claiming TPE until after the regression posts are up, or double claiming anything, or anything else that would be considered cheating. If you go back to some regression threads, you'll even see that I've come in and done the honest thing and corrected HO when I was due a higher number. What has essentially happened, is that two updates have been condensed into one. At no point would that have cost me dropping any stats below 85, unless I wanted them to fall below 85 (strength this offseason, endurance an offseason or two ago), because I've always had the ability to keep them above 85 from all the TPE I still have in my strengths, even if you attempted to retroactively enforce the rule on all of my previous regression posts and forcibly split them into two updates. I might never even reach the point where I need to do that (I'm retiring in S52/S53ish), and Izzy's high water mark for TPE was even higher than mine, so you probably won't have to do it either. This is why we're being assholes about it to you- because despite your screenshots, I know my maths check out, and I know you're going out of your way to try and light a fire because Calgary and Buffalo have an ongoing feud about our duck and rabbit deities. RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - White Cornerback - 10-22-2019 ![]() RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Samsung virtual assistant - 10-22-2019 10-22-2019, 09:16 PMWhite Cornerback Wrote: Dude we're all in this fake hockey league, none of us can claim we got better stuff to do than lurk this site. RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Avakael - 10-22-2019 And just for reference, @ RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Slappydoodle - 10-23-2019 10-22-2019, 09:02 PMAvakael Wrote:10-22-2019, 08:25 PMMike Izzy Wrote: YOU came into this post boasting that you knew this was against the rules and brazenly circumvented them anyway.. no one else did that.... which a spit in the face to anyone on this site that works hard to earn there TPE and play this SIM fairly. at least show some humility when you tell everyone you circumvented the rules. ![]() RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - SlashACM - 10-23-2019 You go izzy RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - Weretarantula - 10-23-2019 10-22-2019, 09:16 PMWhite Cornerback Wrote: cRi MoRe RE: Rule Change/Clarification Regarding Regression - White Cornerback - 10-23-2019 10-23-2019, 08:42 AMWeretarantula Wrote:10-22-2019, 09:16 PMWhite Cornerback Wrote: ![]() |