Login

ztevans · 10-22-2019, 08:32 PM

Can we literally have one thread without someone calling for blood?

Samsung virtual assistant · 10-22-2019, 08:36 PM

10-22-2019, 08:32 PMztevans Wrote: Can we literally have one thread without someone calling for blood?

Banned.

***WannabeFinn*** · 10-22-2019, 08:38 PM

Lol The Augment strikes again

White Cornerback · 10-22-2019, 08:40 PM

10-22-2019, 08:25 PMMike Izzy Wrote:
10-22-2019, 07:49 PMAvakael Wrote: Oh, and every updater who let me do it, too. The most protest I ever got was one updater who said I couldn't add the next seasons equipment in there, but he was overruled by his boss. Might need to just accept that it wasn't remotely considered against the rules. If you want to change the rules now, fine- we can happily work within them. If you want to retroactively apply them, you've got an awful lot of players to penalise.

YOU came into this post boasting that you knew this was against the rules and brazenly circumvented them anyway.. no one else did that.... which a spit in the face to anyone on this site that works hard to earn there TPE and play this SIM fairly. at least show some humility when you tell everyone you circumvented the rules.

I dont give a shit about any loopholes... we all knew why there was a cut off date for tpe and the wording was clear enough that 95% of the league did it right...since HO isnt giving out any info, i looked at all the regression updates and here are the numbers:

Code:
- 94.4 % of the people in regression did theres the right way. (in that 5.6% is 1 team that almost all there players in regression exploited the loophole) - If you take away that 1 team then 96.72% of the league did regression correctly.

So i dont know how it was 10-15 seasons ago, but right when you did it... it was a small amount of people who didnt follow the regression rules. 1 of them being your GM Wannabefinn... which frankly is amazing to me as he just lead the play by the rules outrage post -> **HERE**

So WBF on 1 hand champions the role of fairness and transparency.. while knowlingly circumventing the rules against all his peers with the other hand.

cook my some bacon motherfucking clown

Zombiewolf · 10-22-2019, 08:40 PM

Lmfaooooo of course this spirals down to "Fuck WBF"

I just can't even

Thank you Brandon, Fish, GeckoeyGecko, Karey, Kit, takethehorizon, and Ragnar for the sigs!
[Image: Pw202QP.jpeg]

Player Page || Update page

Samsung virtual assistant · 10-22-2019, 08:45 PM

This site needs to be more like China, who banned Pewdiepie for making Winnie the Pooh jokes.

White Cornerback · 10-22-2019, 08:50 PM

Avakael · 10-22-2019, 09:02 PM

10-22-2019, 08:25 PMMike Izzy Wrote:
10-22-2019, 07:49 PMAvakael Wrote: Oh, and every updater who let me do it, too. The most protest I ever got was one updater who said I couldn't add the next seasons equipment in there, but he was overruled by his boss. Might need to just accept that it wasn't remotely considered against the rules. If you want to change the rules now, fine- we can happily work within them. If you want to retroactively apply them, you've got an awful lot of players to penalise.

YOU came into this post boasting that you knew this was against the rules and brazenly circumvented them anyway.. no one else did that.... which a spit in the face to anyone on this site that works hard to earn there TPE and play this SIM fairly. at least show some humility when you tell everyone you circumvented the rules.

I dont give a shit about any loopholes... we all knew why there was a cut off date for tpe and the wording was clear enough that 95% of the league did it right...since HO isnt giving out any info, i looked at all the regression updates and here are the numbers:

Code:
- 94.4 % of the people in regression did theres the right way. (in that 5.6% is 1 team that almost all there players in regression exploited the loophole) - If you take away that 1 team then 96.72% of the league did regression correctly.

So i dont know how it was 10-15 seasons ago, but right when you did it... it was a small amount of people who didnt follow the regression rules. 1 of them being your GM Wannabefinn... which frankly is amazing to me as he just lead the play by the rules outrage post -> **HERE**

So WBF on 1 hand champions the role of fairness and transparency.. while knowlingly circumventing the rules against all his peers with the other hand.

But that's the point. It wasn't against the rules. The only reason why you thought it was against the rules was because you didn't understand the rules.

I haven't done anything that is considered cheating- like holding off on claiming TPE until after the regression posts are up, or double claiming anything, or anything else that would be considered cheating. If you go back to some regression threads, you'll even see that I've come in and done the honest thing and corrected HO when I was due a higher number.

What has essentially happened, is that two updates have been condensed into one. At no point would that have cost me dropping any stats below 85, unless I wanted them to fall below 85 (strength this offseason, endurance an offseason or two ago), because I've always had the ability to keep them above 85 from all the TPE I still have in my strengths, even if you attempted to retroactively enforce the rule on all of my previous regression posts and forcibly split them into two updates. I might never even reach the point where I need to do that (I'm retiring in S52/S53ish), and Izzy's high water mark for TPE was even higher than mine, so you probably won't have to do it either.

This is why we're being assholes about it to you- because despite your screenshots, I know my maths check out, and I know you're going out of your way to try and light a fire because Calgary and Buffalo have an ongoing feud about our duck and rabbit deities.

White Cornerback · 10-22-2019, 09:16 PM

Samsung virtual assistant · 10-22-2019, 09:24 PM

10-22-2019, 09:16 PMWhite Cornerback Wrote:

Dude we're all in this fake hockey league, none of us can claim we got better stuff to do than lurk this site.

Avakael · 10-22-2019, 10:06 PM

And just for reference, @~~Mike Izzy~~, if you want to know how little TPE I would need to have before I had absolutely no choice but to shed TPE below 86 in any of the 7 skills Metzler has TPE in right now, the answer is 895 TPE. My last regression put me down to 1065, so I still had a full 170 points of clearance before we were even theoretically in trouble. I did not even need to let EN or ST fall below 86 yet, if I didn't want to- I made the decision to let them go to protect my 99s for longer.

Slappydoodle · 10-23-2019, 12:07 AM

10-22-2019, 09:02 PMAvakael Wrote:
10-22-2019, 08:25 PMMike Izzy Wrote: YOU came into this post boasting that you knew this was against the rules and brazenly circumvented them anyway.. no one else did that.... which a spit in the face to anyone on this site that works hard to earn there TPE and play this SIM fairly. at least show some humility when you tell everyone you circumvented the rules.

I dont give a shit about any loopholes... we all knew why there was a cut off date for tpe and the wording was clear enough that 95% of the league did it right...since HO isnt giving out any info, i looked at all the regression updates and here are the numbers:

Code:
- 94.4 % of the people in regression did theres the right way. (in that 5.6% is 1 team that almost all there players in regression exploited the loophole) - If you take away that 1 team then 96.72% of the league did regression correctly.

So i dont know how it was 10-15 seasons ago, but right when you did it... it was a small amount of people who didnt follow the regression rules. 1 of them being your GM Wannabefinn... which frankly is amazing to me as he just lead the play by the rules outrage post -> **HERE**

So WBF on 1 hand champions the role of fairness and transparency.. while knowlingly circumventing the rules against all his peers with the other hand.

But that's the point. It wasn't against the rules. The only reason why you thought it was against the rules was because you didn't understand the rules.

I haven't done anything that is considered cheating- like holding off on claiming TPE until after the regression posts are up, or double claiming anything, or anything else that would be considered cheating. If you go back to some regression threads, you'll even see that I've come in and done the honest thing and corrected HO when I was due a higher number.

What has essentially happened, is that two updates have been condensed into one. At no point would that have cost me dropping any stats below 85, unless I wanted them to fall below 85 (strength this offseason, endurance an offseason or two ago), because I've always had the ability to keep them above 85 from all the TPE I still have in my strengths, even if you attempted to retroactively enforce the rule on all of my previous regression posts and forcibly split them into two updates. I might never even reach the point where I need to do that (I'm retiring in S52/S53ish), and Izzy's high water mark for TPE was even higher than mine, so you probably won't have to do it either.

This is why we're being assholes about it to you- because despite your screenshots, I know my maths check out, and I know you're going out of your way to try and light a fire because Calgary and Buffalo have an ongoing feud about our duck and rabbit deities.

SlashACM · 10-23-2019, 07:43 AM

You go izzy

Weretarantula · 10-23-2019, 08:42 AM

10-22-2019, 09:16 PMWhite Cornerback Wrote:

cRi MoRe

White Cornerback · 10-23-2019, 11:00 AM

10-23-2019, 08:42 AMWeretarantula Wrote:
10-22-2019, 09:16 PMWhite Cornerback Wrote:

cRi MoRe

Navigation

Extra Menu

About us