Login

crutch · 06-17-2024, 12:32 AM

When Chuck Crutchfield gets called for a penalty, he spends a majority of his time on the way to the box arguing the call -- I feel like most hockey players are very much the same in that regard. However, when Crutchfield gets into the box, he is usually either talking shit to some opposing fans near the penalty box, because who doesn't like player interaction with the fans, or he's contemplating what the other team is doing on the Power play and how he can best take advantage of the situation when he gets out of the box. Usually, that doesn't happen as Crutchfield probably isn't the best guy to send in on a breakaway, so he usually skates directly to the bench from the box and tries to change to allow a more talented forward to get on to the ice in order to score.

150.

JNH · 06-17-2024, 12:37 AM

The new rule is that any time a part of a player other than their skates touches the ice, they have to skate to their goal line and touch it before re-entering play. If they don’t, it’s a four minute double minor and they have to touch the goal line upon exiting the box. Now this doesn’t seem too bad, maybe just ridiculous but it adds a nice risk reward component to anything on the ice. Want to dive to break up a chance on defence? Probably worth it as you’re relatively close to the goal line. Want to dive to try to score? Better prep for a long skate if you don’t. Get hit hard and sent flying? Here’s a bag skate for your troubles, little insult to injury. Get tripped? You still gotta go for a rip during the delayed penalty which actually makes a tripping call the most advantageous penalty that you could take. Trip a star player in the offensive zone and hope they tire themselves out.

***boom*** · 06-17-2024, 12:39 AM

Prompt 2

Given that Anastasia Söderström is, well, a goalie, she wouldn't be the one going to the penalty box, but she has gotten a couple penalties before. She's not too experienced with playing the puck yet, so she's put the puck over the glass a couple times and once got a penalty for playing the puck outside the trapezoid after fumbling the puck in the corner. Some goalies take tripping penalties on occasion when going for poke checks, but Ana's conservative positioning-based style of goaltending means she doesn't need to go for the poke check often and risk it. Ana's parents taught her not to get mad and argue penalties as it would break her focus, but if the referee tried to actually put her in the penalty box she would likely just get very confused at why the ref didn't know the rule. She just tries to shake off the nerves when she gets a penalty and get back to playing her style.

Jepox · 06-17-2024, 01:08 AM

written option 2:

Sim Wen superstar defenseman of the Atlanta Inferno is not a fan of sitting in the penalty box so every time he gets called for a penalty and is forced to go sit down and wait for what will likely be two minutes because Atlanta are good and obviously will not give up a goal against despite being a man down he will get mad and rage and yell at the ref sometimes even swear but not too much because he does realize that there are kids watching on tv or in person and he doesn't want to be a bad influence on them. Sometimes he likes to go back out on the ice and target the opposing player who drew the penalty especially if it's someone like Binko Koivu @goldenglutes because he knows that he will always be down for a scrap or be skating with his head down so he can line him up for a big hit and take out that anger that he built up sitting in the penalty box.

174 words

Nhamlet · 06-17-2024, 01:10 AM

Rather than simply creating additional penalties, the real strategy to increase the effectiveness of existing power plays is to heavily snowball the advantage the power play receives.

For example, currently teams are allowed to ice the puck without penalty during a penalty kill which is a strange advantage to gain as part of being a man down. Some might say that it's a player safety thing as being stuck on the ice repeatedly could lead to more tired players and effectively increased risk for player injury.

That's something else that could be done would be allowing the penalty kill team to ice the puck but only in doing so that they would then cause themselves to incur an additional penalty. This can lead to increasing man advantages where the power play Team would then have a great America advantage, and forcing the team that is on the penalty kill to further be penalized by their actions. This would then lead to a high tension moment of the penalty killing team being able to relieve the pressure by the skating out or risking the hawk being ice, and another man being taken from their side. The worst case scenarios at this almost ends in the Perpetual penalty kill because the family killed him could be down to to four men, and as a result be forced to allow power play Coal after power play cole, we'll still continue to incur additional penalties. They would have to be some sort of cap, because then that would just lead to an infinite number of penalties and power plays but at the very least it would make it so that a single power play could be effectively become more and more potent.

natedoeshockey · 06-17-2024, 01:14 AM

Prompt 1

Patya not really known for being very much booksmarts, but at request of league, Patya am try his hardest for come up with penalty that am making peoples get for see more power plays per game. Patya am come up with new rule, is called "no mean chirp" rule. Patya been on ice for long time and know peoples can be so mean for when chirp other players. Patya decide for clean up game and make much nicer. Talk with play, not with mouth. Infraction be called "rough chirping." Is like roughing, but is with mouth. Players go to penalty box, but then must also write on whiteboard with dry-erase marker for whole two minutes "I will not chirp rudely" over and over again until they are to return to ice. Patya thinking this penalty maybe not get called much in friendly games, but it really amp up power plays when teams is big rivals.

***fubaguy*** · 06-17-2024, 01:17 AM

Written Option 2: How does your player react to getting put into the penalty box? Do they have a fit of rage calling the call unfair? Do they focus on the next two minutes trying to think about what they’ll do when they get back into the game? Does their reaction change when the call is very obvious compared to when it’s a little more ambiguous whether or not the penalty was the right call? Do they plot their revenge on the player who drew the penalty?

Bobby Tkachuky is an emotional player who plays with his heart on his sleeve, even though he knows when to lock in for crunch time. When Bobby Tkachuky goes to the penalty box he definitely throws a fit majority of the time. He would complain that the call is bullshit and unfair. He would complain that the play went down easy and they're diving. When the call is obvious then Bobby would stay calm and just accept the punishment. When the penalty ends Bobby is back locked in and looking to get that puck to score on a break away. As soon as the Bobby is back in the game he's back to his normal of giving it all. The one thing about Bobby is that if he thinks the play went down easily he will definitely target them a like more and try to really get a big hit on them. All though Bobby wouldn't go to out of his way, more if he gets the opportunity.

***Seany148*** · 06-17-2024, 01:19 AM

Obviously, being an imposing power forward who hits hard and isn't known for being too soft, Edžus isn't exactly a surprising player to see in the penalty box. However, since coaching the two Solbergs this offseason, Ozolins somehow became a bit more violent. Maybe he realized some people could really be annoying, or maybe he started copying the energy of the more unhinged twin, Sonja. Regardless of the answer, one thing is clear: Sonja’s influence is bad on the Latvian. So bad he even used a Norwegian swear word she told him, on the referee. And with his amazing luck, of course, the ref understood it and gave him an additional 2 minutes for unsportsmanlike conduct. Yeah. Really wonderful out here. All his problems connect back to the Norwegian twins, now that he truly thinks about it… Maybe they're trying to take Latvia down! But they're fun to coach and spend time with… And so the internal monologue goes on, Edžus staring at the void as the penalty ends, then the period. He does not get out of the penalty box. By the end of the intermission, he now has reached philosophical questions such as: “are cookies salad?”

198 words

***hockeyiscool*** · 06-17-2024, 01:31 AM

Shawn pawn was very honored to be selected by the simulation hockey league to enact a shift in one of the rules; Shawn pawn pondered to himself "it's being pretty odd that the league would have a single player consulted on a rule change." Shawn pawn could have easily chosen to create a penalty that is a consistent habit of an opposing rival. If Shawn Pawns morals were not strong he clearly would have targeted one of his rivals, specifically Adam Liebold. He has been known to infringe on the teams goalies and even put his hands near the face of opposing goalies. It is part of the reason why Adam has such a easy time creating windows for his teammates to score easy goals on blinded netminders. The penalty for this offense is a normal two minute minor penalty for hands to the face. However if the player makes contact with the goalie, it is an immediate ejection and his team would need to play the rest of the game short handed.
[url=https://portal.simulationhockey.com/player/151][/url]

[160 words]

***Acsolap*** · 06-17-2024, 01:34 AM

The new rule that I would implement in the simulation hockey league that would result in more power plays and therefore more goals and more excitement would be to remove the goalies blocker and give them another glove. Then I would make it so that any save that was made that wasnt a glove save would result in a two minute minor penalty. As well as this I would scrap the rules that stop teams from only going down to three skaters so that it would become possible for teams to lose all of their skaters if enough penalties were earned. On the flip side of this I would scrap the penalties for instigating and fighting so that we could get back to the days of good old rock em sock em hockey and allow the goon to thrive once again instead of slowly being relegated to the lesser leagues as their skill set became undesirable.

Credit to Ml002, King, Wasty, Carpy, Bruins10, Rum_Ham, Turd Ferguson, Ragnar and Enigmatic for the sigs.
Forge

Player page | Player updates

Serpe x 13 · 06-17-2024, 01:38 AM

My player reacts differently based on the call on the ice, however in some extreme cases, my player will argue with the referee to try and better understand what the penalty was called for. On the other hand, sometimes when the call is ambiguous or seems unfair, a flicker of frustration crosses their face. They exchange a few heated words with the referee, but they quickly reign in their temper. While in the box my player will reflect on what went wrong and how to improve, maintaining composure and readiness for their return to the game. Then, after the penalty is served, my player concentrates on playing smarter and cleaner, ensuring they don’t repeat the mistake. The primary goal is to turn the setback into a comeback, helping their team while keeping a cool head. Thus, in the future my player wants to make sure the same mistake is not made again.

locrianmidwest · 06-17-2024, 01:41 AM

The funniest penalty I can imagine is a penalty for being on the ice for a certain amount of time without touching the puck. Let’s say… you must touch it once every 2 minutes of ice time? Touching the puck counts like muscling for it in the corner or trying to steal it using your stick - it isn’t a measure of possession, just whether or not you touched it. Ignore the tech the league has to shove into the puck and into the helmets for this to work, if you would. Breaking this rule is 30 seconds in the box. Yes, only 30. I feel like given how short the amount of time needed to touch is, it can’t be a long penalty or it’s going to spiral. If the league wants some nee rules, I’ll give ‘em some god damn rules. Hope you like guys fighting about hogging the puck.

Ultimatedestroye · 06-17-2024, 01:48 AM

Cade de Vries is a type of a beast to reckoned with whenever the complex sounds come out of the referees whistle sending our boy de Vries into the penalty. Whenever he is called for one of these penalties, he has 2 modes on him. One is the take responsibility for everything, no matter your contribution into making the penalty happening. When he will get called for, let’s say a tripping, sometimes even if he didn’t commit the crime, he’ll do the time in order for the rest of the team to continue out on the ice like normal (or how normal a 4v5 power play would be). However, there will be on the rare occasion, of the de Vries that woke up and the violence won in his body. No matter how deserving he is of a 2 minute minor, he will yap and complain to the point draymond green would look tame in comparison

*Count Chocula* · 06-17-2024, 01:57 AM

Option 2:

Antoine Beauregard loves being put in the penalty box. He wears the 2 minutes like a badge of honor. It is his dream to one day be the Turd Ferguson winner for most penalty minutes in a season. He came close a few seasons back and started trying to challenge other players to more fights. Alas it did not work out and his coach just ended up getting mad at him over it. Antoine was a fighting specialist, but after 4 seasons and only having 1 actual fight, he had to change his tactics. Now he just hits and crosschecks other players in hopes of getting more minor penalties. His greatest ambition now that he has a cup under his belt is to hoist the Turd. He is genuinely angry at referees when he commits an act that should be penalized, but does not get called for. His superstar status holds him back from more time in the sin bin and it’s unfair.

*Scrufdaddy* · 06-17-2024, 02:50 AM

Written Option 2:

Honestly, Slip McScruff is comfortable in the penalty box. He's in there so often that he's stashed treats and snacks to refuel mid game. One great thing about the penalty box is that you cannot be hit with a minus on the box score when you're stuck in the box. And you get a nice stretch of game where you don't have to play or worry about getting a puck to the head.

Does Slip McScruff deserve to be in the box as much as he is? Probably. It's a young athlete's game and he's stuck clutching at jerseys when they blow by. You can't do that and Slip doesn't try to pretend. He's also a bit frail these days, so he gets called on embellishment occasionally when his hips give out. Luckily, the best thing to do when that happens is sit on the bench for 2 whole minutes and give it a rest.

Slip's reaction is generally a like The Office reaction cam type thing. He's not looking at any real camera and the broadcast is always him looking at some random pylon somewhere.

Navigation

Extra Menu

About us