Hamilton signs Rookies
|
hockeyiscool
SHL GM SHL GM 08-20-2021, 02:59 AMMutedfaith Wrote:Rofl, autocorrect I swear08-20-2021, 02:54 AMhockeyiscool Wrote: Joseph Weston Dwight Knight Tony pepperoniI can't believe Cal Libovitch made it and I didn't.
.simo
Graphic Graders Senior Member
I've been on almost every page in this thread. Putting in the hard yards and can't make a team. No one cares for the little guy.
inverted
Registered Member
grok
Registered Posting Freak 08-20-2021, 03:25 AMJKortesi81 Wrote: The “rookie experience” argument is a bit lame here too. nah sorry I don't really gel with any of this. forcing player movement when the player doesn't have any agency is a shitty deal for the player. they already don't have any choice where they get drafted, moving them a second time sucks. i don't think that putting a first gen in the center of 15 pages of drama thread and counting is good for retention even if they're a sim vet. and even if you don't think jack crasher is textually applicable, its existence and the receipts make hamilton's handshake deals valuable evidence in their case to keep their prospects and get an alternate punishment for missing the deadline.
GeckoeyGecko
Registered JeckoeyTecko
.simo
Graphic Graders Senior Member 08-20-2021, 03:33 AMgrok Wrote:I agree with most of your thoughts here but the Jack Crasher rule seems to have literally 0 relevance to this situation.These players are not FAs therefore FA rules can't apply.08-20-2021, 03:25 AMJKortesi81 Wrote: The “rookie experience” argument is a bit lame here too.
grok
Registered Posting Freak 08-20-2021, 03:35 AMsimo_393 Wrote:Right, the argument isn't that crasher locks them in. The argument is that crasher sets a precedent that handshake deals have explicit material value in the rulebook, so if Hamilton can prove they have handshake deals before the deadline that's evidence the missing contracts were a deadline error. It's not an argument that Hamilton is innocent, it's an argument to reduce the sentence.08-20-2021, 03:33 AMgrok Wrote: nah sorry I don't really gel with any of this. forcing player movement when the player doesn't have any agency is a shitty deal for the player. they already don't have any choice where they get drafted, moving them a second time sucks. i don't think that putting a first gen in the center of 15 pages of drama thread and counting is good for retention even if they're a sim vet. and even if you don't think jack crasher is textually applicable, its existence and the receipts make hamilton's handshake deals valuable evidence in their case to keep their prospects and get an alternate punishment for missing the deadline.I agree with most of your thoughts here but the Jack Crasher rule seems to have literally 0 relevance to this situation.These players are not FAs therefore FA rules can't apply.
grok
Registered Posting Freak 08-20-2021, 03:35 AMsimo_393 Wrote:Right, the argument isn't that crasher locks them in. The argument is that crasher sets a precedent that handshake deals have explicit material value in the rulebook, so if Hamilton can prove they have handshake deals before the deadline that's evidence the missing contracts were a deadline error. It's not an argument that Hamilton is innocent, it's an argument to reduce the sentence.08-20-2021, 03:33 AMgrok Wrote: nah sorry I don't really gel with any of this. forcing player movement when the player doesn't have any agency is a shitty deal for the player. they already don't have any choice where they get drafted, moving them a second time sucks. i don't think that putting a first gen in the center of 15 pages of drama thread and counting is good for retention even if they're a sim vet. and even if you don't think jack crasher is textually applicable, its existence and the receipts make hamilton's handshake deals valuable evidence in their case to keep their prospects and get an alternate punishment for missing the deadline.I agree with most of your thoughts here but the Jack Crasher rule seems to have literally 0 relevance to this situation.These players are not FAs therefore FA rules can't apply.
dmills3
Registered back and worse than ever 08-20-2021, 03:39 AMgrok Wrote:08-20-2021, 03:35 AMsimo_393 Wrote: I agree with most of your thoughts here but the Jack Crasher rule seems to have literally 0 relevance to this situation.These players are not FAs therefore FA rules can't apply.Right, the argument isn't that crasher locks them in. The argument is that crasher sets a precedent that handshake deals have explicit material value in the rulebook, so if Hamilton can prove they have handshake deals before the deadline that's evidence the missing contracts were a deadline error. It's not an argument that Hamilton is innocent, it's an argument to reduce the sentence. Double post. Point and laugh at this man
grok
Registered Posting Freak 08-20-2021, 03:41 AMdmills3 Wrote:08-20-2021, 03:39 AMgrok Wrote: Right, the argument isn't that crasher locks them in. The argument is that crasher sets a precedent that handshake deals have explicit material value in the rulebook, so if Hamilton can prove they have handshake deals before the deadline that's evidence the missing contracts were a deadline error. It's not an argument that Hamilton is innocent, it's an argument to reduce the sentence. i changed my mind, we're taking nour by force now
dmills3
Registered back and worse than ever
Accka
Registered bank4lyfe 08-20-2021, 03:34 AMGeckoeyGecko Wrote: i left for 5 min and there r 2 more pages it is 330 am go to sleep Almost 11am in eastern europe baybeeh /
Big thanks to Pythonic(first sig evah), Sloth(first LAP sig<3) and Ragnar for their sigs<3
Three time playoffs MVP and two time nominee
Triple gold club
Discord: asska
Keygan
Registered S45, S48, S49 Challenge Cup Champion 08-20-2021, 03:33 AMgrok Wrote:08-20-2021, 03:25 AMJKortesi81 Wrote: The “rookie experience” argument is a bit lame here too. Slippery slopes making alternate punishments out of the blue.
ACapitalChicago
Registered :boblincoolright: 08-20-2021, 03:41 AMdmills3 Wrote:08-20-2021, 03:39 AMgrok Wrote: Right, the argument isn't that crasher locks them in. The argument is that crasher sets a precedent that handshake deals have explicit material value in the rulebook, so if Hamilton can prove they have handshake deals before the deadline that's evidence the missing contracts were a deadline error. It's not an argument that Hamilton is innocent, it's an argument to reduce the sentence. Person who caused issue by not posting anything laughing at person who posted twice |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |